• Recent Posts

  • Martindale Hubbell AV Rating

    The Greater Williamsburg area is an exciting place to live and work, especially because of the large number of entrepreneurs who have built businesses from the ground up. These entrepreneurs have taken their passion and made it their profession. Many of us want to take that step. Before you begin, you need to think of the type of business entity you want to form. Our attorneys have extensive business experience, from small one-person companies to publicly traded major corporations. Our attorneys are among the leaders in Virginia in the representation of Common Interest Communities. These communities are generally referred to as "homeowners associations," or "HOAs," and "condominium associations." In the greater Williamsburg area alone, we provide legal assistance to nearly 100 associations. Our attorneys have successfully prosecuted and defended a wide array of civil disputes involving community association covenant enforcement, commercial transactions, construction disputes, contracts, real estate matters, boundary line and easement disputes, employment matters, antitrust litigation, copyright violations, administrative proceedings, and estate issues. Real Estate law encompasses a wide variety of matters, and our attorneys have vast experience to assist you. Whether you need assistance with a commercial or residential closing, or you have questions relating to residential or commercial leasing, we provide experienced advice and counsel to our clients. Zoning law can be a complicated maze of statutes and ordinances. We have ample experience in successful applications for rezoning, variance, and special use permit requests. Finally, commercial and residential construction provide special challenges with respect to financing issues and the construction process. We serve as counsel to various financial institutions.
Print This Post

Small Business Break-Ups – The High Cost of Litigating a Forced Separation

A recent Virginia Supreme Court Case, Cattano v. Bragg, illustrates two points we have made time and time again: 1) Make sure your small business is prepared for an eventual “divorce” between the shareholders; and 2) Litigation is very, very expensive.

In this blog post we will review the Supreme Court’s decision and provide some tips for your small business so that you can avoid the calamity that occurred in this case, which included an attorneys’ fee award of over $260,000 for the prevailing party.

The small business in this case was, ironically, a law firm. The two partners, who were also directors of the firm, owned an unequal share of the company: 73% to 27%. The law firm obtained a substantial fee, $234,000, in a personal injury case. Shortly thereafter, the minority shareholder became upset at certain bookkeeping practices–specifically the distribution of the $234,000 fee–and requested that all the corporate records be made available for inspection. Instead of turning over the records, the majority shareholder: a) terminated the employment of the minority shareholder; and b) held a meeting of the shareholders at which he voted to remove the minority shareholder as a director of the firm. Obviously, the minority shareholder disagreed with the actions taken and litigation ensued.

After the lawsuit was filed, the Circuit Court judge appointed a receiver to “perform a complete accounting of books and records of the Firm, including but not limited to the disposition of all payments.” At trial, the jury determined that the law firm was entitled to the return of the $234,000 and that the minority shareholder was entitled to 27% of the $234,000 settlement. The trial judge then determined that because the lawsuit had “had yielded a substantial benefit to the corporation,” the minority shareholder was entitled to her attorneys’ fees and costs. Consequently, the trial judge awarded the minority shareholder attorney’s fees in the amount of $269,813, plus costs and expenses of $19,415.71!

The Virginia Supreme Court upheld the trial judge, and affirmed the court’s decision. With respect to the large award of attorneys’ fees, the Supreme Court found that the trial court did not abuse its discretion, citing the “complicated proceedings,” and finding that “the circuit court explicitly evaluated the rates paid to experts and lead counsel in this case and found them to be reasonable ‘in this particular case.'”

Lessons Learned?

Obviously, this case had serious ramifications for the company and the two shareholders. The majority shareholder suffered a serious financial blow by losing the case; repaying money to the company; losing the attorneys’ fees and costs he paid to his attorney; losing time he could have used to generate new business and new revenue; and losing the attorneys’ fees and costs he had to pay to the minority shareholder. Even the winning minority shareholder lost time she could have used to generate new business and new revenue, and will not be made truly “whole.”

Sometimes you cannot avoid litigation and an eventual trial verdict. However, with an eye on the tremendous expense litigation can bring, keep these suggestions in mind for your small business:

jt photo 150x150 Does Virginia law require an HOA to transition automatically to homeowner control of the Board of Directors?

Tarley Robinson, PLC, Attorneys and Counsellors at Law

Williamsburg, Virginia

 

Republished by Blog Post Promoter

John Tarley

John is the firm's managing partner and chairs the firm's small business, zoning, and litigation practice areas.

More Posts - Website

Follow Me:
Twitter

Filed under: Business Planning, John Tarley, State & Federal Litigation by John Tarley

Leave a Reply

« | »
Web Development by OneWaveMedia.Com