• Recent Posts

  • Martindale Hubbell AV Rating

    The Greater Williamsburg area is an exciting place to live and work, especially because of the large number of entrepreneurs who have built businesses from the ground up. These entrepreneurs have taken their passion and made it their profession. Many of us want to take that step. Before you begin, you need to think of the type of business entity you want to form. Our attorneys have extensive business experience, from small one-person companies to publicly traded major corporations. Our attorneys are among the leaders in Virginia in the representation of Common Interest Communities. These communities are generally referred to as "homeowners associations," or "HOAs," and "condominium associations." In the greater Williamsburg area alone, we provide legal assistance to nearly 100 associations. Our attorneys have successfully prosecuted and defended a wide array of civil disputes involving community association covenant enforcement, commercial transactions, construction disputes, contracts, real estate matters, boundary line and easement disputes, employment matters, antitrust litigation, copyright violations, administrative proceedings, and estate issues. Real Estate law encompasses a wide variety of matters, and our attorneys have vast experience to assist you. Whether you need assistance with a commercial or residential closing, or you have questions relating to residential or commercial leasing, we provide experienced advice and counsel to our clients. Zoning law can be a complicated maze of statutes and ordinances. We have ample experience in successful applications for rezoning, variance, and special use permit requests. Finally, commercial and residential construction provide special challenges with respect to financing issues and the construction process. We serve as counsel to various financial institutions.
Print This Post

Common Interest Community Board revokes a management company’s license

The Common Interest Community Board (the “CICB”) revoked a management company’s license for regulatory violations.  In a case reported in the September issue of the Community Associations Institute Law Reporter (Virginia Common Interest Community Board v. Sarraga t/a Lakeside Community Management, File No. 2010-00562, June 24, 2010), the CICB revoked the license of Sarraga t/aLakeside Community Management and issued fines totaling $2,000.


Lakeside Community Management (“Lakeside”) had management contracts with four community associations.  Shirley Sarraga started the company in 2003 and experienced rapid growth, growing from “zero to twenty-one communities in less than six years.”  The CICB found that the growth created heavy workloads, poor record keeping and a lack of supervision of personnel.

According to the facts found by the CICB, Lakeside  experienced the type of problems as do many companies who grow fast without instituting proper oversight: Lakeside did not use properly executed management contracts; it used improper accounting processes; it let its license and corporate status expire; and it failed to provide records to one of the community associations after its contract was terminated.

Regulations for management companies require a signed, written contract between the management company and a common interest community before the term of the contract starts and before the management company accepts any payments. On one occasion, Lakeside failed to have a signed management contract with the community association. For three other contracts, Lakeside failed to amend the contracts to reflect that its corporate status had terminated and it now was a sole proprietorship. In addition, once the license for the corporation expired, Sarraga obtained a license as a sole proprietor, meaning Lakeside was no longer licensed.  Because Sarraga failed to have the contracts assigned from Lakeside Management Company, Inc. to Sarraga, the CICB found that Lakeside Management Company, Inc. was managing without the required license.

The CICB found accounting issues.  In a 3 month period,  Lakeside incurred 19 excessive withdrawal fees and 12 overdraft protection transfer fees.  During an office move, the company lost computer data from its general ledger.  For a one year period, the company wrote checks without sufficient funds resulting in additional bank penalties. After one of its contracts was terminated, Lakeside continued to write checks on the association’s bank account without authority from the association.  Although there was no evidence of fraud or criminal activity and the checks were written to pay legitimate expenses, Lakeside acted outside its authority and contrary to its regulations.

The CICB determined that Lakeside was negligent in maintaining and updating its contract and that it failed to properly account for association funds and records.  The CICB stated that “fiduciary responsibility is one of the core responsibilities of a community association manager” and “it was clear to the board that Lakeside was not handling even simple matters pertaining to its own business, so there was no assurance that it could or would follow the regulations when managing associations’ affairs.”

This case deserves more than a blog because it provides a case study on how best intentions can go wrong in a small business without proper attention to details. Without a doubt, a visit to an attorney, early in the process, may have helped the company avoid this drastic outcome.

Management companies should engage in their own annual audits to review existing management contracts and business practices for compliance with the licensing regulations.  Items to consider for your audit are:

  • Annual report filed with the State Corporation Commission
  • Annual fee paid to the State Corporation Commission
  • Annual assessment paid to the CICB
  • Fidelity bond in effect
  • Internal accounting practices
  • Data storage and retrieval policies
  • Review of management contracts for compliance

Management companies should regularly consult an attorney to make sure they are compliant with the requirements of the State Corporation Commission and the CICB.

Tarley Robinson, PLC, Attorneys and Counsellors at Law

Williamsburg, Virginia

Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Susan Tarley

Susan chairs the firm's common interest community (HOAs and Condos) practice area. She was admitted into the College of Community Association Attorneys (“CCAL”). Susan is one of fewer than 150 attorneys nationwide to be admitted to CCAL, for distinguishing herself through contributions to the evolution or practice of community association law.

More Posts - Website

Follow Me:
Twitter

Filed under: Business Planning, Common Interest Community, HOA, Merger & Acquisition, State & Federal Litigation, Susan B. Tarley by Susan Tarley

Leave a Reply

« | »
Web Development by OneWaveMedia.Com